-
-
-
- How to make a music video: music video production tips
- Screenplay tips | Three-act structure
- Video lighting tips - Digital cinematography
- F-stops, T-stops, focal length and lens aperture
- Film techniques
- Stanley Kubrick film techniques
- Steven Spielberg film techniques
- How to convert video to the QuickTime format: AVI to mov
- Filmmaking tips
- Lessons from my favorite film directors
- Film editing tips
- RED camera review: my experience with the RED camera
- How to direct
- How to optimize your computer for video editing
- Sound recording tips | How to record great location sound
- YouTube video ideas & tips
- Film lighting tips
- Shoot video with a shallow depth of field
- Camerawork tips: framing, composition, camera movement
- Camera movement: cranes, dollies and Steadicams
- Camera settings: gamma, sharpness, frame rate and shutter speed
- Video color correction: timing/grading
- Non-linear digital video editing tips
- How to make digital video look like film
- How to learn film editing and become a highly competent editor
- Directing non-professional actors
- Film lighting techniques and their effects
- Camerawork tips
- Film festival tips
- Camera movement: equipment, techniques and best practices
- Videography | Digital video tips
- Long lenses vs. wide lenses
- Shooting slow motion with camcorders: frame rates and post-production
- Film sound recording tips
- Production design and your project's color palette
- Screenplay basics
- Technical directing tips
- Role of the 1st assistant director
- Cobra Crane II review
- Why filmmaking needs lights
- Production design: controlling your project's color scheme
- Long uncut master shots in films
- The movie making process: a step-by-step breakdown
- Independent film self-distribution
- How to learn camerawork and develop a strong visual sense
- Independent film distribution tips: a guide for indie filmmakers
- Choosing between the 2.35 and 16:9 / 1.85 aspect ratios
- Zooming and zoom lens tips
- Learning about different focal lengths and the look they produce
- Film continuity
- Character arc
- Film and video competitions: a warning for independent filmmakers
- Tsunami (TMPG) MPEG-2 encoder settings
- How 3D movies work
- Logging takes, finding shots and preparing to edit a film
- Projecting films digitally in theaters (2K and 4K)
- Directing child actors: casting, motivating them and other tips
- Location sound recording, scratch tracks and re-recording dialogue in post-production
- Independent film distribution with CreateSpace
- Film casting tips
- What is HDV?
- Using the word "beat" for pauses in screenplays
- DVD burning guide
- Solving problems creatively when editing a film
- Mixing color temperatures and tweaking color balance
- Film networking
- Directing, shooting and editing projects for the web vs. the big screen
- Learning film direction, screenwriting and film editing
- Shooting aerial B-roll shots on a budget
- Royalty-free production music
- Should the look of a video be achieved by tweaking camera settings or should it be done in post-production?
- Impressive shots to add production value to an abseiling video
- Overcoming writer's block when writing a screenplay: the importance of taking right action
- Teaching screenwriting to young students
The good old days when content was valuable
There used to be a time when content was valuable. If you managed to complete a feature film, provided money was spent judiciously during production, it could be sold for a profit — even if it was junk. The reel of film could be marketed, regardless of its intrinsic merits.
I cannot help thinking of the first projects produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick. His very first film — a 16-minute short entitled “Day of the Fight” — made him a small profit, which he then invested in the production of his second project. The merits of that short are not the point here. The point is that he made a product, and was able to sell it for more than he spent to make it.
The same applies to his second feature film, Killer’s Kiss. Not his best film by any means, but he did manage to sell it to United Artists, who then made a neat profit on it. It mostly ran as a second feature, but it made money! This all happened in the 1950s, by the way. Back then, a reel of film was worth something. It was a commodity; it had value.
Things are very different now. Independent feature films rarely make their money back, let alone a profit, no matter how little was spent to make them, not to mention the fact that if you give someone a DVD screener of your film, it will only be a matter of days (or hours) before the entire movie is available for free somewhere on the Internet. This happened to a couple of friends of mine. (Luckily one of them was able to make a profit on video distribution anyway, because the budget was very low and the movie was highly marketable.)
Life was undoubtedly better back in the days when watching a movie was a real treat and could only be done by going to a movie theater and buying a ticket. To be sure, making movies independently was also much more difficult back then, but it could still be done by the most motivated, and the return on investment (financial and otherwise) was much greater.
Content — be it a film, a piece of writing or a piece of music — is more valuable when there is less of it around and people are willing to pay good money for the privilege of enjoying it. Once you start to give it away for free, you have opened Pandora’s box and you only have a painful decline to look forward to. This is why the big studios recently decided to keep their most valuable content off the Internet, lest they end up like the newspapers or the record industry. Wise move.
Tweet