Sound recording tips: how to record location sound in film and video production

The importance of recording quality sound

By far the biggest technical shortcoming of many videos and independent films is the sound. The dialogue recorded on location, which in most cases is the project’s only source of dialogue in post-production, is not always recorded with correct technique, which results in poor audio quality. Location sound recording is a huge topic, but I will attempt to cover the salient points based on my past experience.

1. Choose the right microphone

To record high-quality location sound the right type of microphone must be used: ultra-directional (hypercardioid) for external locations, directional (supercardioid, shorter) for interiors, and less directional (cardioid) for cramped interior locations.

The more directional the microphone, the greater the extent to which it selectively picks up sounds from its front end, and the higher the signal-to-noise ratio will be; but bear in mind that excessively directional microphones will pick up too much echo in tight interior locations, so the right compromise must be struck in those situations. The Audio-Technica BP4073 Lightweight Shotgun Microphone is an outstanding dialogue microphone – the favorite of many professionals. I have personally used it and it produces truly awesome location sound, if used correctly.

2. Place the microphone as close to the actor’s mouth as possible

Having picked the right microphone, the key to recording rich, clean, high-quality location dialogue is to place the microphone as close as possible to the subject. In this way the actor’s voice will be much louder than the background noise. The microphone should also ideally be overhead, pointing downwards at the actor’s mouth. The second best choice is to place the microphone below the bottom frame edge, with the microphone pointing upwards at the actor’s mouth.

Location sound recording tipsThe best way to do this is to make the actor(s) get into position, frame them, instruct the boom operator to dip the microphone into the frame, lift it out until it is just out of frame, set the level using a sample line from the actors, and roll!

If you use this technique consistently I guarantee that all you will have to do in post-production to obtain professional, clean-sounding dialogue is set a consistent sound level across the movie, patch up the occasional extraneous noise with clean sound from another take and place the audio cuts wisely (more about this later).

With this strict technique the microphone will occasionally dip into the frame, requiring a re-take of at least that part of the shot, but the amazing sound quality will more than compensate for that. I shot a 30-minute movie in this way and although my insistence on this technique made for a demanding shoot, the resulting sound was really worth it. I was very glad I insisted on it.

3. Shoot several takes of every setup

You should definitely do several takes of each scene, regardless of how well the actors are performing, because in this way the entire scene will be covered with good sound, even if no single take was flawless from beginning to end (they rarely are). If there are cars driving past outside, this will definitely be the case. With multiple takes, finding a clean version of any one section will be a breeze. You can (and should) listen to the sound during and after each take on location, but I guarantee there will be little annoying sounds that you missed in the hustle and bustle of shooting. That’s when you’ll be glad you did several takes.

I once shot in an interior location where the ancient heating system would occasionally emit a diminutive but very annoying “ding”. Not only was this not noticeable while shooting – it also occasionally overlapped with words, which was subtle but annoying. I was able to produce a truly flawless soundtrack in post-production by replacing the word or words that overlapped with the noise with clean versions from other takes – all done manually with Adobe Premiere. You’d be amazed at how seamless you can make your soundtrack by using such techniques. Time-consuming maybe, but immensely worthwhile.

If the extraneous noise, like a car passing by, happens in between lines of dialogue, it’s much easier: just splice out the noise and replace it with clean ambient sound. Which brings me on to the next sound recording tip:

4. Record at least 30 seconds of ambient sound

For every location and every shot in that location, be sure to record at least 30 seconds of ambient sound. That means shutting everyone up and recording 30 seconds of silence. Of course it’s not real silence; it is ambient sound, and the “silence” will be different for every location and every setup in that location (because the loudness of ambient sound depends in part on how close the mic is the actors, which in turn depends on how the shot is framed).

5. Ensure the boom operator is competent

Make sure the boom operator does not move his/her hands along the boom pole during takes, as the sound will be conducted by the pole to the mic and will produce unacceptable noise, notwithstanding the shock mount that you should be using. The shock mount is a contraption that holds the microphone in a web of elastic bands – this is to insulate it as much as possible from vibrations traveling along the boom pole as the boom operator moves. Professional microphones are incredibly sensitive! Taking rings off is also a good idea.

6. Don’t settle for the onboard microphone

Whatever you do, remember that the surest way to make your production sound hopelessly amateurish is to record sound with an onboard mic (a microphone mounted on the camera). It will be an easier shoot but your audience will hate the poor sound.

Being attached to the camera, the mic will almost always be far away from the actors, resulting in noisy, echo-ridden dialogue, which will relegate your project to the amateur category. Get that microphone as close to the subjects’ mouths as possible!

You could of course use an onboard mic for the entire shoot and replace this poor location sound (the “scratch track”) with clean dialogue re-recorded in a studio, but this is difficult to pull off, time-consuming and expensive. Even the biggest movies use location sound as much as possible, only resorting to ADR (automatic dialogue replacement) when it’s absolutely necessary. There simply isn’t anything quite as good as well-recorded location sound.

7. Avoid distortion at all costs when recording digital sound

If you are recording digital audio, regardless of whether it’s a DAT recorder or digital video, it is important to set the levels lower than you would with an analogue device (such as the Nagra). This is because with digital audio, over-modulating the sound recording level produces intolerably ugly distortion. In digital sound, the transition from “intense signal” to “distorted signal” is sudden and unacceptable – just as with the exposure levels of video itself (see digital cinematography tips).

To set digital audio recording levels correctly, before rolling ask the actor to give a sample of the loudest line in the shot, then give yourself a good 6dB of headroom above that. This is good practice with digital audio recording.

How to make the soundtrack seamless in post-production

For a truly seamless soundtrack, you will also have to disguise the sound cuts by not aligning them with the video cuts — in other words, the video and audio cuts should be staggered.

The reason for which this is necessary is that the quality of the ambient sound may vary between setups and throughout the shooting day, and this change in background sounds will be audible when you cut from one shot to another. You can disguise the cuts by making them coincide with a louder sound (such as someone beginning to talk). I once shot in a location where it was quiet in the morning but full of loud birds in the afternoon. Making those shots match required a lot of creative editing, but it worked.

Conclusion

It is worth giving high priority to the quality of the sound you record for your projects. Remember that an audience can forgive imperfect camerawork if the subject is compelling; what they will never accept is poor sound.

Location sound recording, scratch tracks and re-recording dialogue in post-production: a question from a reader

“As a couple of scenes are filmed about 300 meters from a highway there’s a chance that dialogue will be disturbed by a passing vehicle. Ambient sound will be recorded further away. How do you film to make voice-over as easy as possible, lip movements, angles? Can you adjust the microphone in order to just pick up nearby dialogue, any special equipment needed? Should voice-over be avoided at all costs, if not, when is it actually the best choice to make?

“Different effects that can be attained, while dubbing in a studio pre-production, let’s say I want the voice-over to sound as if they where in a forest but the mic is located in a studio, what can you do to produce such an effect or is it as simple as taking the mic outside?”

My answer:

It is absolutely essential that you record production sound on every take on location, even if its quality is unsatisfactory and must be replaced later.  This location sound track is known as the “scratch track.”  The reason for which it is so absolutely vital to record sound on every take is that it will allow you to re-record the dialogue in the studio later using the on-location recording as a guide.  If you simply shoot it MOS (with no sound recording whatsoever), recording the dialogue later will be an absolute nightmare, because it will never completely match the image.  Specifically, what you will do is simply instruct the actor to deliver the line precisely as it is in that particular take.  In other words, the scratch track simply has to be good enough of the actor to hear what he said and how he said it. Again, I cannot over-overemphasize just how vital this is. This is standard procedure in movie making.

As I wrote in my location sound recording guide, you should always aim to record extremely high-quality sound during principal photography and then use it in the final release after some cleaning up and good mixing.  The scratch track method should only be used on locations where there truly is no way to get clean recording, due to traffic or other reasons. Always aim to record sound that is good enough to be used directly in the final release.

Never, ever record without sound – the dubbing process is going to be a nightmare.  On my very first film we recorded excellent sound (for which I assumed personal responsibility) but on a few shots I deliberately did not record sound for a specific reason. For example, in one very wide shot I thought that, due to the framing, the closest the microphone could be was many feet away, so I simply dispensed with sound recording and shot it MOS.  I was also motivated by the fact that, in view of how wide the shot was, the actors’ lips were not visible, so synchronization would not be a problem.

When I edited the film, I sorely wished I had recorded a scratch track – there is something terribly disconcerting about having to record a line for a completely mute shot in which you simply cannot remember how the actors delivered their lines.  Obviously you have a rough idea of what they said, but not how they said it.  It is incredibly difficult to dub lines in post-production without a scratch track for reference, and the result is never entirely satisfactory. Avoid this situation at all costs!

Regarding the forest ambient sound, it’s very simple: record clean dialogue in the studio and then simply superimpose ambient sound recorded in the forest. Again, this is standard, and gives you control over the separate tracks. You can superimpose as many audio tracks as you want.

I hope this helps!

Tagged with 

16 thoughts on “Sound recording tips: how to record location sound in film and video production

  1. When I was in college I took a singing class, and the teacher told us to think about “head voice.” This means making an effort to project the sound out of your head rather than your chest. He said that this is what makes your voice carry to the back of the hall. This is also the reason why placing the mike over the frame is preferable to placing it under the frame. Under the frame you pick up more “chest” voice. This may also lead you to take a negative view of Lav mikes, which of course pick up chest voice because that’s where they are.

  2. Location Sound says:

    I am a production sound mixer in Arizona. Great advice and tips.

  3. AZ location sound says:

    While recording audio on location is often a challenge, knowing proper positioning of the microphone can cut down on background noise and create clear audio. While there are many tips and tricks, experience and the right equipment palays a large part in the success of clean and clear audio.

  4. Mike Proctor says:

    Thanks for this valuable info! I found advice in here that I have never gleaned from the books I’ve read. Thanks and, if you publish more, please email me with a heads up. Thanks a bunch!

  5. Great stuff. I love the audio mixing part as tedious as it is. I would never give up tweaking it a bit no matter what! I think you should have included the use of a clapper board or just a loud clap…I did a electronics review once and I thought the voice was a good enough sync but for whatever reason syncing was a NIGHTMARE! But every time I do a loud clap it works great for both automatic syncing with Plural eyes for FCP 7 or FCP X’s decent auto sync. Also while most of the time the scratch track is utter crap sometimes you can actually put it to good use or even clean it up a bit. For all the good audio I do I use the Zoom H1 handy recorder…true stereo sound that lays the ground work a nice surround mix, I always mix in surround even if the delivery is stereo…it seams to give the stereo signal a more ambitious sound and I keep the surround master on my computer for viewing in my HT at times 😀 Again the Zoom H1 is a great device, only $99 but you get amazing audio quality! With a Zoom H1 a shotgun mic, a couple of lav. mics and a boom mic you can really create Grade A sound, may sound over whelming but its rather simple as long as your committed…I even have a few projects where the sound mix surpasses the actual content 😀 Mostly my test projects and improv films though.

    • Hi Nate,

      Yes, sound mixing is slow, painstaking work — but very satisfying when it all comes together!

      -Ed

    • william mann says:

      Hey Nate, I have been searching for the right microphone to buy.
      I will try to film as much as possible inside. I’m caught between the sennheiser me66 or the rode ntg-2? You said you loved the sound you were able to create. Any recommendations? Thanks in advance.

  6. Some really cool tips there. Thanks for sharing this information. I’m a studio engineer doing my first location recording project. Should help a lot..Cheers!

  7. Have you ever used a compressor on set to avoid clipping? This is common when recording vocals, although opinions differ on where the threshold should be set. The reason given is that you don’t want to ruin an otherwise stellar performance if the singer gets too loud. I’m just curious to see how sound engineering for film differs from what I’m used to in the studio.

  8. Rob Palmer says:

    Great article, very helpful. I’m doing a doco in the Australian outback later in the year and due to funding constraints, I will be doing camera and sound whilst the talent does the interviews and narration. I’m proposing to use Senheiser wireless mics as I am unable to operate a boom and keep focus. Any thoughts on how best to do this? Rob

  9. Hi there, thanks for the advice 🙂
    Is it a good idea to record the ambient sound in stereo? Or is it better in mono?

    • I’d say stereo for sure, but then again I’m a noob.

    • In my view, this is a moot point, because ambient sound in the meaning intended in this article is a diffuse, non-directional background sound — a combination of people breathing, birds singing, heating pipes humming, and so on. Hence the stereo or mono choice will not make a meaningful difference.

      For the avoidance of doubt, my definition of ambient sound excludes Foley and other sounds effects, which should be recorded in stereo if you want a stereo sound mix. Good luck!

  10. Michael Atencio says:

    You suggested an expensive microphone and I agree, it’s worth every penny. I was wondering what you suggest for a documentary film in the way of lavalier microphones. I’ll use a boom for exterior shots when possible, but shooting and directing the whole film as a one-man-band has some challenges with sound. Wireless Lav mics can be used for what I’m doing in my interviews or discussions, correct?

  11. I have an uncle who would like to work on a short film, and he would like me to help him out during a weekend when he shoots. My experience is with microphones, so I appreciate when you brought up getting the microphone as close to the subject as possible because it really does make a difference. As fun as it would be to work on the sound for my uncle’s project, I think it might be good to look into working with a production sound recordist to get the best results.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>